Privacy-first architecture

You don't need cookies to personalize.

Cookie-based tools were built for logged-in ecommerce. Physical retail has walk-in traffic, anonymous visitors, and a one-person legal team. Here's the comparison.

Busyfolder vs. cookie-based tools

Cookie-Based (Dynamic Yield, Nosto)
Busyfolder
How it worksDrop a cookie → track behavior → build profileZIP code → public signals → return banner
Data collectedBrowser fingerprint, device ID, session history, clickstream5-digit ZIP only (24-hour TTL)
Consent requiredYes — GDPR/CCPA consent bannerNo — zero PII by architecture
Legal review timeWeeks to months15 minutes (DPA template included)
Works for anonymous visitorsNo (needs cookie/session)Yes (works on first visit)
Works for walk-in Wi-FiNoYes (IP → ZIP)
Integration time6 months (platform migration)2 weeks (one POST endpoint)
Pricing$50K–$200K+/year$999/month (5–10 stores)
Cookie-safetyDependent on browser policiesImmune — no cookies used

What Busyfolder reads instead of tracking you

All signals are public, aggregated, zero-PII. No profile is built. No visitor is identified.

WeatherNOAA

Rain → waterproof jackets; UV > 8 → SPF 50

Local eventsTicketmaster, Eventbrite

SXSW → festival essentials; game day → team gear

DemographicsCensus, SafeGraph

Affluent ZIP → premium collection; near campus → student budget

Points of interestSafeGraph

Near gym → post-workout; near hotel → travel sizes

Holidays & trendsGoogle Trends

Local holiday → seasonal; trending → now popular

The architecture

Visitor arrives → Your server gets ZIP (IP geolocation)
POST /v1/select { zip, banners[] } → Busyfolder reads public signals
Returns best banner_id in <60ms
ZIP discarded after 24 hours. No profile built.

See it work with your own ZIP codes

Free sandbox. No card. No PII. No expiry.

vdev